Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 14 de 14
Filtrar
1.
J Arthroplasty ; 37(8): 1426-1430.e3, 2022 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1616375

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A survey was conducted at the 2021 Annual Meeting of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS) to evaluate current practice management strategies among AAHKS members. METHODS: An application was used by AAHKS members to answer both multiple-choice and yes or no questions. Specific questions were asked regarding the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on practice patterns. RESULTS: There was a dramatic acceleration in same day total joint arthroplasty with 85% of AAHKS members performing same day total joint arthroplasty. More AAHKS members remain in private practice (46%) than other practice types, whereas fee for service (34%) and relative value units (26%) are the major form of compensation. At the present time, 93% of practices are experiencing staffing shortages, and these shortages are having an impact on surgical volume. CONCLUSION: This survey elucidates the current practice patterns of AAHKS members. The pandemic has had a significant impact on some aspects of practice activity. Future surveys need to monitor changes in practice patterns over time.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , COVID-19 , Fuerza Laboral en Salud , Ortopedia , Gestión de la Práctica Profesional , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/economía , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/estadística & datos numéricos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/economía , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/métodos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Atención a la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Fuerza Laboral en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Ortopedia/economía , Ortopedia/organización & administración , Ortopedia/estadística & datos numéricos , Pandemias , Gestión de la Práctica Profesional/economía , Gestión de la Práctica Profesional/organización & administración , Gestión de la Práctica Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/economía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/organización & administración , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Práctica Profesional/economía , Práctica Profesional/organización & administración , Práctica Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
2.
J Marital Fam Ther ; 47(3): 551-565, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1169822

RESUMEN

As a response to the COVID-19 global crisis, many in the couple/marital and family therapy (CMFT) professional community quickly met the challenge of providing services to clients via telebehavioral health (TBH) services. As this public health emergency endures, family therapists must continue to engage in TBH practice professionally and ethically. The rapid adoption of TBH with minimal training and experience during this public health emergency can result in crises for both individual therapists as well as for the profession in implementing electronic record-keeping, conducting virtual sessions, and communicating online with various clinical populations. The risk of insufficient training and supervision create a challenge to new and experienced family therapists. This article summarizes the work done by the profession thus far to respond to this public health emergency and presents a roadmap of recommendations for navigating those challenges into the future and offers ideas about how to sustain quality TBH practice.


Asunto(s)
Terapia de Parejas , Terapia Familiar , Guías como Asunto , Personal de Salud , Servicios de Salud Mental , Práctica Profesional , Telemedicina , Terapia de Parejas/organización & administración , Terapia de Parejas/normas , Terapia Familiar/organización & administración , Terapia Familiar/normas , Guías como Asunto/normas , Personal de Salud/educación , Personal de Salud/normas , Humanos , Servicios de Salud Mental/organización & administración , Servicios de Salud Mental/normas , Práctica Profesional/organización & administración , Práctica Profesional/normas , Telemedicina/organización & administración , Telemedicina/normas
7.
Postgrad Med J ; 96(1141): 711-717, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-901414

RESUMEN

Facing an investigation into performance concerns can be one of the most traumatic events in a doctor's career, and badly handled investigations can lead to severe distress. Yet there is no systematic way for National Health Service (NHS) Trusts to record the frequency of investigations, and extremely little data on the long-term outcomes of such action for the doctors. The document-Maintaining High Professional Standards in the Modern NHS (a framework for the initial investigation of concerns about doctors and dentists in the NHS)-should protect doctors from facing unfair or mismanaged performance management procedures, which include conduct, capability and health. Equally, it provides NHS Trusts with a framework that must be adhered to when managing performance concerns regarding doctors. Yet, very few doctors have even heard of it or know about the provisions it contains for their protection, and the implementation of the framework appears to be very variable across NHS Trusts. By empowering all doctors with the knowledge of what performance management procedures exist and how best practice should be implemented, we aim to ensure that they are informed participants in any investigation should it occur.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica/normas , Médicos , Práctica Profesional , Profesionalismo , Rendimiento Laboral/normas , Humanos , Responsabilidad Legal , Errores Médicos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Errores Médicos/prevención & control , Administración de Personal/métodos , Médicos/psicología , Médicos/normas , Práctica Profesional/organización & administración , Práctica Profesional/normas , Profesionalismo/ética , Profesionalismo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Profesionalismo/normas , Medicina Estatal/normas , Reino Unido , Recursos Humanos/organización & administración
9.
Sleep Med Clin ; 15(3): 347-358, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-693065

RESUMEN

Synchronous telemedicine allows clinicians to expand their reach by using technology to take care of patients who otherwise may not be seen. Establishing a telemedicine practice can be daunting. This article outlines how to implement a synchronous telemedicine practice into an existing workflow. Telemedicine-specific considerations are discussed, as well as guidance regarding practice assessment, financial feasibility, technical considerations, and clinical guidance to translate in-person visit skills into an effective virtual visit.


Asunto(s)
Práctica Profesional/organización & administración , Telemedicina/organización & administración , Humanos , Práctica Profesional/economía , Telemedicina/economía
10.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) ; 66(4): 491-497, 2020 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-613691

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Physiotherapy services are necessary for hospitalized patients of COVID-19 as well as chronic patients. Thus, physiotherapists present an increased risk of exposure to coronavirus. This study aimed to determine the number of physiotherapists who interrupted their services because of the COVID-19 pandemic and to verify the procedures adopted by the ones who are still working. METHODS: The sample comprised 619 physiotherapists who worked in Portugal, 154 (24.9%) male and 465 (75.1%) female, aged between 22 and 67 years (34.47±8.70). The measurement instrument was an on-line questionnaire applied in late March 2020 through contacts and social networks. RESULTS: 453 (73.2%) physiotherapists interrupted their work activities in person because of the pandemic and 166 (26.8%) continue to work in person. The main measures adopted by physical therapists who continue to work in person included: hand washing (21.5%), mask use (20.3%), material disinfection (19.3%) and, glove use (19.3%). Of the physiotherapists who are not working in person (n = 453), 267 (58.9%) continue to monitor their patients at a distance, and 186 (41.1%) are not monitoring the patients. The main measures used by physiotherapists to monitor their patients at a distance included: written treatment prescription (38%), making explanatory videos (26.7%), and synchronous video conference treatment (23.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data revealed that most of the physiotherapists interrupted their face-to-face practices because of the COVID-19 pandemic, however, once they do not follow up their patients' treatment in person, most of them adapted to monitor their patients from a distance.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Pandemias/prevención & control , Fisioterapeutas/provisión & distribución , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/organización & administración , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , COVID-19 , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fisioterapeutas/tendencias , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/tendencias , Portugal , Práctica Profesional/organización & administración , Práctica Profesional/tendencias , SARS-CoV-2 , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Telerrehabilitación/organización & administración , Adulto Joven
11.
Ann Biol Clin (Paris) ; 78(3): 269-277, 2020 06 01.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-608309

RESUMEN

The SARS-CoV-2 virus is responsible for an epidemic disease called COVID-19, which was initially evidenced in Wuhan, China, and spread very rapidly in China and around the world. In France, the first isolated case seems now to be reported in December 2019, stage 3 of the COVID-19 epidemic was triggered on March 14th, the start of the planned containment exit from May 11th. Healthcare services have faced a large influx of patients who may be beyond their capacity to receive and care, particularly in the Large-East and Ile-de-France regions. Some patients show an evolution of the disease never observed before with other coronaviruses and develop in a few days a very important inflammatory reaction, which can lead to death of patients. A working group of the French Society of Clinical Biology (SFBC) was set up with the objective of providing updated information on the current status of the biological prescriptions (focusing on biochemistry ones) and their evolution during the epidemic, and of analyzing the biological parameters associated with comorbidities and patient evolution in order to link biological results with medical events. The expanded working group covers all sectors of medical biology in France and extends to the French-speaking world: hospital sectors (CHU and CH, Army Training Hospitals) and the private sector opening a field of view on the biological situation in establishments for dependent elderly, social establishments and clinical medical institutions. The purpose of this article is the presentation of this working group and its immediate and future actions.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Bioquímica/organización & administración , Biomarcadores/análisis , Servicios de Laboratorio Clínico/organización & administración , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Sociedades Científicas/organización & administración , Betacoronavirus/aislamiento & purificación , Betacoronavirus/patogenicidad , Bioquímica/normas , Biomarcadores/sangre , COVID-19 , Servicios de Laboratorio Clínico/normas , Redes Comunitarias/organización & administración , Redes Comunitarias/normas , Redes Comunitarias/tendencias , Infecciones por Coronavirus/sangre , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Brotes de Enfermedades , Francia/epidemiología , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos , Colaboración Intersectorial , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/sangre , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Práctica Profesional/organización & administración , Práctica Profesional/normas , Práctica Profesional/tendencias , SARS-CoV-2 , Sociedades Científicas/normas , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/organización & administración , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/normas
13.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 102(5): 323-332, 2020 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-155078

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Several articles have been published about the reorganisation of surgical activity during the COVID-19 pandemic but few, if any, have focused on the impact that this has had on emergency and trauma surgery. Our aim was to review the most current data on COVID-19 to provide essential suggestions on how to manage the acute abdomen during the pandemic. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted of the most relevant English language articles on COVID-19 and surgery published between 15 December 2019 and 30 March 2020. FINDINGS: Access to the operating theatre is almost exclusively restricted to emergencies and oncological procedures. The use of laparoscopy in COVID-19 positive patients should be cautiously considered. The main risk lies in the presence of the virus in the pneumoperitoneum: the aerosol released in the operating theatre could contaminate both staff and the environment. CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, all efforts should be deployed in order to evaluate the feasibility of postponing surgery until the patient is no longer considered potentially infectious or at risk of perioperative complications. If surgery is deemed necessary, the emergency surgeon must minimise the risk of exposure to the virus by involving a minimal number of healthcare staff and shortening the occupation of the operating theatre. In case of a lack of security measures to enable safe laparoscopy, open surgery should be considered.


Asunto(s)
Abdomen Agudo/cirugía , Betacoronavirus/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Quirófanos/organización & administración , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/efectos adversos , Abdomen Agudo/complicaciones , Aerosoles/efectos adversos , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , Neumoperitoneo Artificial/efectos adversos , Práctica Profesional/organización & administración , SARS-CoV-2 , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/métodos
14.
Hand Surg Rehabil ; 39(3): 159-166, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-47793

RESUMEN

The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic has severely affected medical treatment protocols throughout the world. While the pandemic does not affect hand surgeons at first glance, they have a role to play. The purpose of this study was to describe the different measures that have been put in place in response to the COVID-19 pandemic by hand surgeons throughout the world. The survey comprised 47 surgeons working in 34 countries who responded to an online questionnaire. We found that the protocols varied in terms of visitors, health professionals in the operating room, patient waiting areas, wards and emergency rooms. Based on these preliminary findings, an international consensus on hand surgery practices for the current viral pandemic, and future ones, needs to be built rapidly.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Mano/cirugía , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/organización & administración , Práctica Profesional/organización & administración , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Internacionalidad , Internet , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Práctica Profesional/normas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA